Well, it's about time!

According to this article on FT.com, there is legislation that is waiting George Bush's signature which bans the outsourcing of federal work to low cost countries. Now, to me, this only seems right, but, of course, officials in India are up in arms about it. They site all sorts of reasons, including the harm to free trade, but what it comes down to is that they're mad at the loss of revenue. It's "unfair", they claim, to keep them from that business. Of course, they think it's perfectly fine to take the jobs away from American workers. Oh, sure, that's just fine with them.

Look, I'm all for free trade, in theory, but I think the government is right to put some breaks on how fast those jobs leave the US. At least give American workers the chance to retrain. Don't flood the market with thousands upon thousands of tech workers all competeing for the same few jobs. It'll be just like what happened to Flint, Michigan all over again, but on a much larger scale. Okay, sure, we all benefited from over-seas production, eventually, but in the mean time, those poor people in Flint had the stuffing kicked out of them! The same thing happened in Houston during the oil industry bust. I think we should at least try to keep it from happening in the IT industry. For pity's sake, the United States created the computer industry! The least we can do is protect our tech workers a little bit.
Anyway, it's interesting to see how the powers that be in India repsond to the tightening market. It's all our fault, of course. We should stop picking on them and taking revenue away from them. Hmm, that sounds familiar, doesn't it?

Well, I've done it now!

Okay, so I've been messing around with PERL for Netware and I came up with at least one thing that I thought was useful. I call it "dfmail.pl", which is short of DiskFreeE-Mail. It's a simple little script that will check the available space on all the volumes of a server and e-mail the results to the user of your choice. You will have to edit the script to set the e-mail address, but otherwise, it should run okay. Oh, I tested it on Netware 5.1 servers, with the latest service pack, so I have no idea how well it will work on Netware 6. If anyone tries it, let me know!

Download DFMail.ZIP

Don't you hate getting that dreaded "404 Page Not Found" error?

Well, now there's something that might make it better: 404 Reaearch Lab. That's right, an organization dedicated to getting the most out of your 404 pages.
Actually, it's quite fun. There's a history of how the 404 error originated, tips on how to avoid 404 pages on your site, and even hints on how to make a better 404 page. So, let's not worry quite so much about blame and focus instead on dealing with the errors more better! (Yes, that was intentionally bad grammar, used to illustrate... Oh, never mind.)

Go have fun, it's Friday!

you have a moat!

I've been working on my CompTIA Security+ certification using, in part, the Security+ Exam Cram 2 book to study for it. And, on page 227, under the Organizational Security section, they say:

The last physical barrier is a moat. Moats surround part or all of a facility and are excellent physical barriers because they have a low profile and are not as obtrusive as fencing. In this instance, the consideration would be the depth and width. As with all physical barriers, the moat must be well maintained.

No, I am not kidding. The book actually suggests that a moat is a physical defence. I can just see trying to sell this to my boss now.
"Uh, Joe? I feel our revised security plan really needs a moat."
"Did you say 'a moat'?"
"Yep, it's right there in the Security+ cirriculum. A moat, Joe."
"A moat."
"With alligators, if you think we can manage to get them through the budget."

Oh, God help me. What am I doing in this business? If it weren't so damn funny, it'd make me cry.

Of course, it's not the United States economy...

Rather, it's India's. Yep, that's right, our outsourcing habit is really growing India's economy. According to this article on AustalianIT, "Indian software company Wipro third-quarter net profit jumped 19 per cent from a year earlier to a record 2.74 billion rupees ($78 million)" and "Infosys, India's second-largest software services exporter, reported last week third-quarter net profit jumped a better-than-expected 28 percent to 3.3 billion rupees ($91.3 million)". But, you say, that could be due to any of thousands of market forces, right? Well, not according to the article. The article claims that Wipro is "...one of many software companies benefiting from a trend by US and European companies seeking to cut costs by outsourcing jobs to India to take advantage of a large, cheap pool of English-speaking graduates. "

I think anyone who reads my blog on a regular basis is smart enough to draw their own conclusions about this. Instead of making further comment, I'll just ask a question. If you're an IT professional, how's your personal economy these days? Could you have used some of that revenue?
Think about it.

as all that after all...

Well, last week I logged an entry about Adobe's deal with the government to try and stamp out conterfiting and already someone's beaten their "protection". According to this article on Wired News, folks have found several ways around the currency scanning protection. Everything from using an older version of Photoshop to importing the picture from the clipboard gets around this little protection. So, as the article says, that begs the question, "why did they bother?" Was it government pressure? A vast conspiracy between the Bilderbugers and the Knights Templar? Who knows... In any case, it's easily defeatable and generated a bunch of bad press for them.

Go figure.

A bootable Linux security "suite".

Cool. I saw this on the ScreenSavers, but it's still cool and probably new to most of us. It's a a tool called PHLAK. PHLAK stands for Professional Hacker's Linux Assault Kit. But, what it is is a bootable Linux distro that's loaded with security tools and information. Oh, it's also free. I have to admit that I haven't actually played with it. Yet. But, on the surface, it looks pretty cool.
Frankly, I like the idea of bootable distros. You can crank them up and try them out without reformating your hard drive. That's pretty cool. And, for some applications, like security auditing, it's nice to not leave too many footprints. A bootable distro is pretty good for that. Not perfect, of course, but it does limit certain kinds of trails and fingerprints.
Anyway, it's Linux, new and fun. Go check it out!

A different kind of "object oriented" computing...

Hey, it's Friday. Traditional day for slacking and having fun, right? Well, have some digital fun, thanks to TechTV, with BlockCAD. It's pretty much like the Legos™ that you remember. Bright colors and simple shapes. Just the thing for a Friday after a long complicated work week.

Have fun!

Jack Messman opens LinuxWorld.

Well, based on this story from WiredNews, Novell is really serious about their commitment to Linux. Jack Messman, who is the CEO of Novell, said that we need more OpenSource projects and applications. I really think his opening the biggest Linux show in the country show just how much Novell has committed to Linux. They're really betting on the fact that enterprise computing is looking for a more robust, more stable, system than we've gotten used to recently. Certainly, I'd like a system that has fewer crashes and more uptime than most of the Windows servers I've worked on! And, Unix, which is still what runs the Internet, no matter what Micro$oft would like you to believe, is the most stable OS that I've ever worked on, Netware included. So, it seems like a good match for Novell. A series of products that integrate Novell's easy-to-use tools and Linux's stability seems like a good idea. At least, I think it's the right move, obviously since I got my Linux+ certification. I just hope the rest of the IT world sees it our way!

I see this as a good thing.

I seem to recall hearing about this quite some time ago, but it's surfaced again and seems to be causing a ruckus. Not sure why, though. According to this article on AustrailianIT, Adobe has added code to Photoshop to prevent people from making duplicates of certain currencies. Their argument is, of course, that legitimate users shouldn't be troubled by this since they shouldn't have any issues with "imperfect" image. Frankly, I agree. But, this has apparently riled a bunch of artist types for some reason.
The article doesn't go into many details for their reasoning, but I can't imagine what would cause so much turmoil. I mean, what purpose could you have for creating a such a hyper-accurate reproduction of United States currency? If it's for art, surely the artist can recreate a reasonable replacement to go over the change. And, even given the "art" aspect of it, I have a hard time picturing what might require such accurate copies of legal tender.
Anyway, the story is interesting.